A new arrival in the GAVO Data Center is UCAC5, another example of a slew of new catalogs combining pre-existing astrometry with Gaia DR1, just like the HSOY catalog we’ve featured here a couple of weeks back.
That’s a nice opportunity to show how to use ADQL’s JOIN operator for something else than the well-known CONTAINS-type crossmatch. Since both UCAC5 and HSOY reference Gaia DR1, both have, for each object, a notion which element of the Gaia source catalog they correspond to. For HSOY, that’s the
gaia_id column, in UCAC5, it’s just
source_id. Hence, to compare results from both efforts, all you have to do is to join on
source_id=gaia_id (you can save yourself the explicit table references here because the column names are unique to each table.
So, if you want to compare proper motions, all you need to do is to point your favourite TAP client’s interface to http://dc.g-vo.org/tap and run
SELECT in_unit(avg(uc.pmra-hsoy.pmra), 'mas/yr') AS pmradiff, in_unit(avg(uc.pmde-hsoy.pmde), 'mas/yr') AS pmdediff, count(*) as n, ivo_healpix_index (6, raj2000, dej2000) AS hpx FROM hsoy.main AS hsoy JOIN ucac5.main as uc ON (uc.source_id=hsoy.gaia_id) WHERE comp IS NULL -- hsoy junk filter AND clone IS NULL -- again, hsoy junk filter GROUP BY hpx
(see Taylor et al’s All of the Sky if you’re unsure what do make of the healpix/GROUP BY magic).
Of course, the fact that both tables are in the same service helps, but with a bit of upload magic you could do about the same analysis across TAP services.
Just so there’s a colourful image in this post, too, here’s what this query shows for the differences in proper motion in RA:
(equatorial coordinates, and the aux axis is a bit cropped here; try for yourself to see how things look for PM in declination or when plotted in galactic coordinates).
What does this image mean? Well, it means that probably both UCAC5 and HSOY would still putt kinks into the sky if you wait long enough.
In the brightest and darkest points, if you waited 250 years, the coordinate system induced by each catalog on the sky would be off by 1 arcsec with respect to the other (on a sphere, that means there’s kinks somewhere). It may seem amazing that there’s agreement to at least this level between the two catalogs – mind you, 1 arcsec is still more than 100 times smaller than you could see by eye; you’d have to go back to the Mesolithic age to have the slightest chance of spotting the disagreement without serious optical aids. But when Gaia DR2 will come around (hopefully around April 2018), our sky will be more stable even than that.
Of course, both UCAC5 and HSOY are, indirectly, standing on the shoulders of the same giant, namely Hipparcos and Tycho, so the agreement may be less surprising, and we strongly suspect that a similar image will look a whole lot less pleasant when Gaia has straightened out the sky, in particular towards weaker stars.
But still: do you want to bet if UCAC5 or HSOY will turn out to be closer to a non-kinking sky? Let us know. Qualifications („For bright stars…”) are allowed.